2007 Toyota Tundra
To absolutely no one's surprise, the new
made-in-Texas 2007 Toyota Tundra is
significantly larger than the one it replaces.
That's not much of an achievement; after all,
Toyota only had to have the CAD systems juice
every dimension up about 5 percent to get that
job done. What is surprising is how clearly the
new Tundra breaks with traditional Toyota truck
philosophy. After 72 years building straightforward, simply
decorated, relatively unadorned and conservative
trucks, Toyota is now in the stylish truck
business.
There's an argument to be made that this
paradigmatic design shift by Toyota really took
place with the introduction of the
2005 Tacoma. Could be. But even the Tacoma
is nowhere near as agonizingly self-conscious as
this new Tundra.
Self-conscious though it is, there are elements
of the new Tundra that can only be described as
brilliant. And other parts that have to count as
bizarre or disappointing.
Exactly how big is the new Tundra? That depends
on which Tundra is being measured - Regular Cab,
Double Cab, and mucho macho CrewMax. Excised
from the lineup is the extended Access Cab that
had been a staple of the Tundra line since its
introduction back in 1999 (and this writer has
owned one since 1999). By eliminating the
extended cab model and adding a monster-spec
crew cab, Toyota is aping the Dodge range of
Rams. However all 2007 Tundras are, at least
nominally, half ton models while Dodge restricts
it's Godzilla, the Mega Cab, to 3/4- and one-ton
models.
The three Tundra body styles come riding atop
three different wheelbases. The Regular Cab
Short Bed (78.7-inch long bed) model has 126.8
inches between its front and rear axle lines
while the Regular Cab Long Bed (97.6-inch long
bed), Double Cab Short Bed (78.7-inch long bed)
and CrewMax (66.7-inch long bed) stretch that to
145.7 inches, and finally, the Double Cab Long
Bed (97.6-inch long bed) runs a vast 164.6 inch
wheelbase.
In contrast the Dodge Ram 1500 comes in
wheelbases starting at 120.5 inches for the
Regular Cab Short Bed, then 140.5 inches for the
Regular Cab Long Bed and Quad Cab Short Bed, and
beyond that is a 160.5-inch wheelbase for the
Quad Cab Long Bed. The 2500-series Mega Cab
rides on the 160.5-inch wheelbase.
When it comes to overall length the Tundra is
209.8 inches long as a Regular Cab Short Bed,
228.7 inches long as Regular Cab Long Bed,
Double Cab Short Bed or Crew Max, and 247.5
inches long as a Double Cab Long Bed. The
various Dodge Rams are 207.7, 229.7 or 247.7
inches long.
Go through all the specs one by one and it's
apparent that the Tundra is right next to the
Ram in every one - sometimes a little bit
smaller, often a little bit larger.
Dimensionally, it's pretty much the same story
with the Ford F-150 and Chevrolet Silverado. And
it's a significantly bigger truck than the 2006
Tundra which as a Regular Cab or Access Cab
measured 218.3 inches long over a 128.3-inch
wheelbase and in largest Double Cab form
stretched out 230.1 inches over a 140.5-inch
wheelbase.
In short (as if there's anything short about
this big Toyota), the Tundra is now fully as
gargantuan as the domestic branded competition.
And it matches that size with some awesome
capability. Payloads range from 1,410 to 2,080
pounds and every new V-8-powered Tundra can lug
at least 10,100 pounds behind it. Of course the
domestic brand trucks can haul a heck of a lot
as well. In fact the capabilities of all these
trucks are at some point academic since very few
of the owners will ever approach them.
Two of the three
engines
available on the
new Tundra are
slightly tweaked
versions of
familiar engines
installed in the
outgoing Tundra.
The third engine
is new from
crankcase to
throttle body
and probably the
finest
gasoline-fired
V-8 ever
installed in a
pickup. And the
world is full of
great truck
engines.
Base powerplant
for the new
Tundra is a
version of Toyota's DOHC, 24-valve, aluminum block and
heads, 4.0-liter
V-6 which, in
part thanks to
VVT-I variable
valve timing, is
rated at 236
horsepower at
5200 rpm and a
peak 266
pound-feet of
torque at 4000
rpm. The entry
level V-8 is Toyota's, DOHC, 32-valve, iron block, aluminum
heads 4.7-liter
V-8 which, in
part thanks to
VVT-I variable
valve timing, is
rated at 271
horsepower at
5400 rpm and a
peak 313
pound-feet of
torque at 3400
rpm. Both these
engines are
sweet natured in
their power
delivery, smooth
in their
operation and
relatively
efficient in
their use of
fuel. And both
come lashed to a
standard,
perfectly
mannered
five-speed
automatic
transmission.
It's the biggest
engine that
impresses the
most however.
Branded as the
iForce 5.7 to
the public, it's
known as the
3UR-FE within Toyota. Designed around the same structural
architecture as
the "1UR-FSE"
4.6-liter V-8
used in the
Lexus LS 460
that was
introduced last
year and
assembled at Toyota's
plant in
Huntsville Alabama, this is Toyota's first aluminum block and aluminum head
truck V-8. It's
also the most
American truck
engine the
company has
built with the
aluminum engine
blocks and heads
cast by Bodine
Aluminum (owned
by Toyota) in Troy, Missouri.
Like the Lexus
1UR-FSE, the
3UR-FE features
cast-in iron
cylinder liners,
dual overhead
cams, four
valves over
every cylinder
and VVT-I
variable valve
timing on both
the intake and
exhaust valves.
However while
the Lexus engine
uses direct fuel
injection, the
Tundra engine
uses
conventional
fuel injection.
But the big
difference is,
naturally,
displacement.
Both engines
have
94-millimeter
cylinder bores,
but the Lexus
engine's stroke
is a short 83
millimeters
while the Tundra
engine's stroke
is a long
102-millimeters.
It's that long
stroke that has
the I-Force 5.7
making 401
pound-feet of
peak torque at
3600 rpm while
the LS 460's
engine makes
it's 367
pound-feet of
peak torque at a
dizzier 4100
rpm.
On top of all
that throw in
technologies
like an
"Acoustic
Control
Induction
System" that
uses butterfly
valves inside
the intake
manifold that in
two stages can
adjust the
length of the
intake tract
based on
throttle
position and
engine speed,
tubular
stainless steel
headers feeding
an stainless
exhaust system,
and the result
is a total of
381-horsepower.
That makes the
I-Force 5.7 the
most powerful
engine ever sold
by Toyota in North America… car, truck or
forklift. It
beats the LS
460's 1UR-FSE by
a whole
horsepower.
There are a lot
of excellent
truck engines
out there - the
315-horsepower,
5.3-liter Vortec
V-8 in the Chevy
Silverado,
317-horsepower,
5.6-liter
Endurance V-8 in
the Nissan Titan
and the
345-horsepower,
5.7-liter HEMI
V-8 in the Dodge
Ram to name
three - but the
Tundra's I-Force
5.7 has them
covered with
more power, an
utterly seamless
delivery of that
power, and
eerily creamy
smoothness
that's almost
spooky in its
Lexus-ness. Then
on top of that Toyota pushes the new engine's advantage by
pairing it with
a standard
six-speed
automatic
transmission.
Using advanced
manual counting
technology
(one-one
thousand,
two-one
thousand,
three-one
thousand) during
the press
introduction of
the new Tundra,
a
two-wheel-drive
5.7-equipped
Regular Cab
Short Bed ripped
from 0 to 60 in
just about six
seconds flat.
Except for
high-performance
sport trucks
like the Ford
SVT Lightning
and Dodge Ram
SRT-10, the new
Tundra is likely
the quickest
factory pickup
ever built. And
unlike the
SRT-10 or
Lightning, it
retains all the
usefulness a
truck should
have while being
blisteringly
quick.
The combination
of the I-Force
5.7 and the
six-speed
automatic
transmission is
simply…
brilliant.
While the new Tundra features an all-new frame, all-new suspension system and all-new everything else, there's nothing surprising in the engineering of its structure and chassis. The frame is a conventional steel ladder structure with fully boxed rails for the front half and C-channel members on the back half. The front suspension is double A-arms and coil springs whether the truck is a 4x2 or a 4x4 and the rear suspension is a solid axle on leaf springs. There are four discs behind the standard 18-inch wheels (20s are an option) and ABS, electronic brake-force distribution and electronic brake assist are standard on all models.
The new Tundra drives as if it were a smaller truck than it actually is. The rack-and-pinion steering isn't particularly quick, but it's precise and does provide some feedback to the driver. The ride, even on 4x4 models, is well controlled and there's not too much nosedive under braking. No truck this size will squirt through openings like a sports car, but even when hauling trailer in Kentucky crosswinds the driver never has trouble managing the Tundra's behavior and decorum. Is it a better chassis than that of the new Silverado or any direct competitor? That's an argument best left up to future direct comparison tests. But it's clear that, at the very least, this massive's road manners are fully competitive.
In place of a traditional limited slip differential, the Tundra has adopted an "Automatic Limited Slip Differential" that works with the standard stability control to provide "computer-controlled cross-axle torque management that allows some wheel-spin." Whatever. It seems that a traditional mechanical, clutch-type LSD would be simpler. Time and more exposure under more extreme circumstances will tell whether the Tundra's system works under more severe circumstances.
Never has any full-size truck from any manufacturer tried as hard to look impressive as the new Tundra. From the massive trapezoidal grille in front, through the wedge shaped cabs and onto the bulges along the flanks of the deep cargo boxes, this is a truck whose designers were determined to be interesting whether the person looking at the machine were 30 feet or an inch away from it. There's a strong science fiction theme to the styling - the original Battlestar Galactica to be specific - that won't please everyone. And it's a startling break from the previous Tundra that was so conservatively drawn.
Those design themes continue inside the Tundra where the instrumentation lives burrowed into deep individual tunnels for the tachometer and speedometer, while the audio system (and optional navigation system) has it's own distinctly colored center stack just above the straightforward ventilation controls. Compared to the easily scanned instrumentation in the outgoing Tundra, this new dashboard is fussy and somewhat inelegant. It's not bad, but like the exterior, it's trying very, very hard to be interesting.
There's a lot of good in the interior - loads of places to store stuff, a truly vast center console, and the CrewMax is dang near a limousine with a bed - but why is Toyota trying so hard?
For what seems like decades, Toyota has been the quality standard against which other mainstream forms of transportation must be judged. However in the new Tundra there are some apparent places where the quality of material (at least on the pre-production vehicles driven at the press event) seems iffy. The dash top and top of the doors seem to have been cut off rather than molded with plastics harder than one expects of a Toyota. The massive door latch handles don't have the heft to be satisfying when they're used.
Of course there's a lot of good material in this new Tundra's insides, the question is why doesn't all of it seem better than the old Tundra's? If Toyota's going to set lofty standards with their previous vehicles, it's up to the new ones to live up to them.
Toyota's goal is to double Tundra sales from 100,000 a year to 200,000 a year with this new vehicle. With growth in the full-size truck market slowing during these times of high fuel expense, that increase in volume for Toyota will have to come from the hides of Dodge, Ford, Chevy, GMC, and Nissan. And Toyota, being the cash-rich behemoth that it is, can afford to price the new Tundra aggressively to grab that market share.
But at the same time, it seems that Toyota doesn't have the confidence to be the conservative player it's always been. If this truck were as cleanly styled as the new Silverado on the outside and as un-fussy inside as the truck it's replacing, that and the brilliant I-Force 5.7 would probably be enough to guarantee Toyota grabbing the market share it seeks. The truck they're putting on the market however, is more polarizing than that. Some people are simply going to hate it. And some are going to love it.
Source thecarconnection.com
|